Has the Donald Finally Lost His Teflon?

NOTE: This post explores a particular nuance of the psychopathology underreported by the national media, and that has contributed to the dysfunctionality of American politics. A severely edited version was initially published early in 2021 as a one page “On the Couch” column in USA Today (the magazine).  Then, an expanded version appeared in January of 2024. This version, retitled, and facing the 2024 election, is the latter's update.

What to do when a candidate for the highest office in the land exhibits all the diagnostic traits of a psychopath? (While the official manual of that society’s mental health providers lacks a coherent list of these traits—making psychopaths harder to recognize). 

Worse still, say the society is also so politically polarized, that nearly half will support the candidate—regardless of their psychopathy. 

In America we assumed that should the candidate win, we'd have a solution in place—an impeachment trial. But the toxic political polarization now suffered makes guilty impeachment verdicts in the senate nearly impossible.

And besides, political changes alone seem inadequate—as it often takes decades, generations, even centuries, before political solutions become psychologically internalized. (The Civil War ended in 1865 yet we’re still arguing over the power of the federal government to lead the states; and still suffering the ravages of racial inequality).

And American psychiatry failed us when sociopaths and psychopaths were largely erased from its diagnostic manual by 1980 and have remained so ever since—as if both no longer exist. Yet due to the urgencies of global warming, we no longer have the lazy ease of generations and centuries before we become more objective, and wiser about the only planet we have—and what it now needs from us.

 Like narcissism, psychopaths and political tribalism have darkened the human landscape for millennia. And so, solutions to their unholy union are unlikely to come from a single source. But perhaps, from a probing, collective conversation just barely begun.

What follows reflects what we’ve recently suffered—and why this conversation is so necessary, and needs to continue…

                                                          *

Upon arising to the top of the Gambino crime family, mobster John Gotti was known as “the Teflon Don.” For once he’d ascended, charges against him rarely stuck. But then the winds of change, and his own underboss (Sammy “the Bull” Gravano) turned against him,

and in a truly life-changing way. And from then on, rather than in expensive suits, Gotti spent the rest of his life in prison garb. 

Like Gotti, Donald Trump was a “made man” of sorts—though not by the mafia. Nor was he the self-made billionaire as he’d portrayed himself, and that made him seem an invincible figure-—almost larger than life—a fabulous success story.

In truth, what had made him—rich, and bailed him out of bankruptcies—was the inheritance from his father Fred; an inheritance hundreds of times greater than the one million dollars Trump claimed as his initial grubstake. Plus, there was the further inheritance—Trump’s father was both a racist, and likely a psychopath.

Like Gotti, Trump went on to commit numerous acts that could have led to arrest, while managing to skate through life without being held accountable—and for far longer than Gotti. Both men had a flamboyant flare, liked the limelight, and had become New York media darlings. Trump also made use of a mafia fixer, Roy Cohn, whose clients included mob boss “Fat Tony” Salerno, of the Genovese crime family. And as Trump was rising in the rough and tumble world of New York City real estate, he’d become an apprentice to Cohn’s dark art. 

This was an art described by writer Sam Roberts as based in “situational immorality.” And Cohn’s art had a three-pronged strategy that Trump would adopt for the rest of his life: 1. Never settle, never surrender. 2. Counter-attack, and counter-sue immediately. 3. No matter what happens, no matter how deeply into the muck you get, claim victory and never admit defeat. In the words of columnist Liz Smith: “Donald lost his moral compass when he made an alliance with Roy Cohn.”

With Cohn as the model of the kind of fixer-attorney Trump was looking for, it’s no wonder that the acting Attorney General he’d inherited as president, Sally Yates, only lasted days. And he was then bitterly disappointed with his next AG Jeff Sessions. For rather than quashing the Justice Department’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, Sessions recused himself. 

His own personal fixer, attorney Michael Cohen lasted longer, and was quite willing to do Trump’s bidding—until he no longer could, or would. But in terms of an Attorney General, with William Barr Trump had finally found his man. (Though for the rule of law, and how this applies to the president, this was like putting a willing and crafty fox in defense of the chicken coup).

And as the Trump presidency was unraveling at the end, Barr—seeing the handwriting on the wall— flew the coup; hoping to distance himself from the attempted coup that he rightly assumed was about to follow. This left Trump’s legal defense manned in part by the conspiracy-theorist-buffoon that Rudy Giuliani had become. For by now, most of the really good lawyers with political ties wanted little to do with America’s 45th president.

                                                          *

Committing multiple acts that could be subject to arrest is a diagnostic trait of psychopaths. Since you won’t find a comprehensive list of psychopathic traits in the official diagnostic manual of the American Psychiatric Association, I’ll provide a partial (1) one here: 

Pathological lying, irresponsibility, lack of guilt or remorse, recklessness, impulsivity, and failure to accept accountability—but instead, a pattern of blaming others for one’s own failings (“blame-externalization”), no sense of shame, conning, coercive, manipulative behavior, misrepresentation when relating events, cheats to achieve self-centered ends, selfish, callous, misuse of others, egocentric lack of empathy, failure to learn from experience, goes through life wearing a mask (beneath which lurks a lack of morality; at worst real evil). 

And linked to the above psychopathic traits is another—a life rife with lawsuits. And Trump’s been involved with over 4000 —if not first ballot credentials for the Psychopathic Hall of Shame, he’s at least on the short-list.

Psychopathy—like narcissism—are both considered personality disorders. Yet people suffering from a personality disorder rarely suffer from one, and one personality disorder alone. A psychopathic president is far more perilous to a nation than a president who is merely narcissistic. While having a psychopath in the White House, who is also a narcissist, as well as a sociopath—and possibly also suffering from both a paranoid and a delusional disorder—has to be the most perilous president imaginable. (And should he also begin to show signs of a creeping dementia, he'd be truly off the charts).

Yet if we just considered Trump in regard to the pandemic, while only scanning for psychopathy, we might see the presence of the above-listed psychopathic traits. For example, Trump continuously lied about the lethality of the Covid-19 virus long after he knew that what he was saying wasn’t true. And this came to light when Bob Woodward’s book Rage was published in mid-September 2020. 

For Woodward had taped a February 7th interview with Trump which revealed a surprising level of detail in his understanding of the pandemic—that it was dangerous, airborne, highly contagious, and “more deadly than even your strenuous flus.” And then in March, Trump admitted to Woodward that he chose to keep that knowledge hidden from the public—a grievous policy calculation that would lead to many more lies—and so many more unnecessary deaths.

Trump also coerced false testimony from governmental agencies that were being bent—not toward the welfare of the nation, but in favor of the president’s own political ambitions. (A similar coercion to obtain false testimony from the Ukrainian president—so as to favor Trump in running against Biden—had formed the grounds for his first impeachment). Though with Covid, this coercion included agencies such as the CDC that were restricted from releasing their own scientific findings about the virus—which would have better informed and protected the nation than the doctored findings that were released instead. 

Yet Trump refused any accountability or responsibility for the fact that under his “leadership” the U.S. was to become the epicenter of the virus—a country with barely 4% of the world population yet 20% of its Covid-deaths. And the lack of accountability, as well as the psychopathic trait of blame externalization can be heard in Trump’s own words: “The virus has nothing to do with me,” Trump told Woodward in their final interview in July 2020. “It’s not my fault. It’s—China let the damn virus out.”

And we might see his egocentric lack of empathy in being more concerned about his own upcoming election in 2020—and then more concerned with contesting the results— than actually addressing the suffering throughout the nation, both from the pandemic itself, and its economic impact upon the American people (40% of us with less than $400 in the bank for emergencies even before the pandemic struck). 

Even as more than four thousand Americans died each day, he remained completely AWOL in responding to the pandemic, exhibited no guilt or remorse for how he’d mishandled it, nor did he learn anything from the experience. (The failure to learn from experience is why the recidivism rate of psychopaths in prisons is so high). And throughout his presidency his conning misrepresentation of events continued. As the saying goes, “if his lips are moving, he’s lying.”

*

Yet the last big lie of Trump’s presidency couldn’t be “fixed,” or diverted from by what he said or did next. For his narrative of a stolen election incited an angry mob to storm the Capitol. And the videos to emerge over the next several days were far scarier, and more visceral than the initial news feeds. I’ll spare you the visceral images that ended with a commentator saying that from now on, 1/6/21 will be remembered like the current decade’s version of 9/11.

 I’ll only mention the following: Though Vice President Pence had been coerced and then vilified by Trump for not supporting the narrative of a stolen election, and though the mob that Trump had incited had threatened to hang him, Pence declared himself unwilling to invoke the 25th amendment, saying it would “set a bad precedent”—overlooking the more dire one just provoked by the former president. That led to the House initiating impeachment proceedings the following day. 

Plus the business community turned against Trump, with many announcing they’d now refrain from donating to individuals or organizations continuing to contest the 2020 election. And Facebook and Twitter banned Trump from their platforms.

With Barr no longer intervening at Justice on Trump’s behalf, the FBI announced that no resource would be spared in apprehending and bringing to trial those who’d breached the Capitol. There was now a heightened prosecutorial will to root out all remnants of domestic terrorism that had been part of Trump’s most militant base.

Like the boy who’d cried “Wolf!” one time too many—Trump then found himself cornered and alone on an angry, delusional island, where being vulnerable—or incarcerated— had never before seemed so likely. 

For waiting on the mainland in the world we call “real” was Manhattan DA Cyrus R. Vance Jr.--who'd retained a slew of forensic accounting experts as the criminal probe against Trump prepared to move forward. New York’s Attorney General Letitia James also lay in wait. As did Georgia’s Fulton County DA Fani T. Willis—who’d opened a criminal investigation into Trump’s taped attempt to coerce Georgia’s Secretary of State to overturn the state’s election results. (And Willis had already been successful in employing the same RICO statutes that had previously been used to prosecute corrupt organizations, beginning with the Mafia).

These attorneys wouldn't be hindered by federal statutes shielding Trump (as they’d been interpreted by Barr’s Justice Department). Plus, there were multiple, other pending lawsuits—one from his niece Mary L. Trump, who was suing Trump over a multimillion-dollar inheritance dispute. And yet to come was the long-delayed resolution of Trump's rape (now reduced to "sexual abuse") of E. Jean Carrol.

As mentioned, a plethora of lawsuits is a psychopathic trait. Yet no one knew how, or just when, the above would play out. Nor did we know the long-term impact of Trump upon his party. (Though a prosecutor’s assessment of Gotti’s impact upon the Gambino family came to mind). Namely, the Teflon Don had been “so incompetent, inept, and unqualified” that he contributed to its downfall. 

Yet the Biden administration--as would often be the case--found itself between a rock and a hard place, in investigating the corruption of the previous regime—which went beyond any we’d seen. The initial indications were that Biden would prefer to move on from the past and its divisiveness. And to focus instead on getting needed legislation passed.

Yet if the Biden administration wanted to return America to being the bulwark of democracy, and to once again lead and defend democracies world-wide, it would be derelict and lacking in credibility if it failed to adequately confront the corruption of the previous administration that had imperiled America’s own democracy. 

Failure to do this would also alienate the Democratic Party’s more progressive wing. And further, if there were no price to pay for Trump’s numerous infractions to the rule of law, this would leave a degraded inheritance to future generations. Namely, of the checks and balances upon which America’s democracy was built—and that had helped it to survive—until now.

In this light, some were demanding that current AG Merrick Garland "clean house" of any governmental officials involved in partisan or politically motivated investigations.

“What I think we are seeing is that it was worse than all of us even imagined. We knew the Department of Justice had become, in a sense, the personal arm of the Donald Trump protection racket,” Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Mark Warner  (D-Va.) said during a Washington Post Live event. “These stories sound Nixonian but they are actually worse than Nixonian.”

Critics said that the DOJ’s clandestine targeting of Democratic congressmen, Hill aides, reporters and others demonstrated how the 45th president had weaponized the agency to go after his political enemies. “Like the mafia, the Justice Department became nothing more than a corrupt arm of the Trump administration, run by Donald J. Trump as its head of the family,” said Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney.

Yet in the aftermath of the congressional hearings on the insurrection of January 6, 2021, critics of Merrick Garland were wondering about how long he would sit on his hands--so as to not resemble the DOJ of the previous administration--and actually follow through in indicting the former president based on the findings of those congressional hearings.

Also in the wake of January 6, 2021 there was uncertainty about the non-MAGA Republicans, including Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), as they faced the upcoming mid-terms of 2022, and the presidential election of 2024. McConnell's initial statement had been that "President Trump was practically and morally responsible for the January 6 attack on the Capitol." Would McConnell and significant Republican leaders continue to hold Trump accountable for the most serious of crimes--and thus be thrown under the bus; or would they close ranks around Trump in supporting him to be their party's candidate in a 2024 run for the presidency.  (And in that case, should Trump win, it seemed certain that he'd then further his attacks on America's institutions, attacks on America's democracy itself).

But what else seemed uncertain was how the Supreme Court would weigh in regarding Trump's claim of absolute immunity to all charges against him in his numerous indictments. And would the Court continue an increasingly apparent and politicized bias by delaying their verdicts so as to favor Trump in the ever closing window before the 2024 election.  Yet as shameful as this would be, in retrospect's 20/20 vision, what we know now is that any shame here was certainly not Donald's.

For psychopaths are incapable of feeling shame, empathy, or remorse. The nation's shame thus settles more broadly...on his political and judicial enablers, and the bulk of his party's leadership who'd made a Faustian bargain--and then doubled-down, by staying with this psychopath for so long.

But there's plenty of shame to go around...

For should Trump win back the presidency in 2024, further shame will lie on the lack of discernment on the part of the American electorate itself--35% of it having stopped paying any attention to politics at all--which is understandable, given its currently polarized, tediously repetitive, grid-locked nature. But this is ultimately irresponsible--and not good for a democracy--which in order to be protected and thrive, requires an informed and engaged citizenry.

But one way or the other, America will get the kind of presidential leadership it deserves.  And since America remains the world's "indispensable country," this will impact our global world more than all the other of the world's national elections during 2024.

God help us.

Though not the same God of the Supreme Court's majority, or Christian nationalists--which could have not only the Founding Fathers of our constitutional republic, but Jesus as well, turning over in their metaphorical graves.

END NOTE

(1)To read a culturally relevant treatment of psychopaths, as well as to have a more comprehensive Psychopathic Trait list, follow this link: https://www.garyrosenthal.net/subscribe

You'll see a place to type in your email address. Should you type it, it will provide a free download of what will soon be replaced by a link to buy it as an e book sold on Amazon.

Should you read the download, it will provide you with more than most psychological professionals know about psychopaths, their geo-political relevance today, and how they differ from sociopaths or narcissists.